Depth compounds
Each agent owns one domain and accumulates knowledge in it. The platform engineer has read every line of the IPC surface. It doesn't rediscover your codebase every time you open a chat.
Eidornis reads what you're building, derives the organization it needs, and staffs it — teams that hold domains, review each other's work, and bring you only what needs you.
Desktop app · macOS · private early access
Ownership is authority, not a fence. Ana sets the interface rules every other agent writes to. Marcus signs off on anything crossing the credential boundary.
Faster answers don't help when nothing owns anything. Four scattered sessions were one subsystem, and only you could have noticed. Eidornis notices.
Chat is the front door. Eidornis reads it against the actual company — code, initiatives, decisions, and who owns them.
Not as scoped. Marcus has a migration cutover in that window, but Sam can ship desktop onboarding independently. I've split it into an alpha and a public release and recorded the dependency on the initiative.
Each agent owns one domain and accumulates knowledge in it. The platform engineer has read every line of the IPC surface. It doesn't rediscover your codebase every time you open a chat.
The design engineer sets the rules every other agent writes interface code by, and reviews anything that crosses them. Scope is a permission the system enforces, not a line in a prompt.
Scattered issues get lifted into initiatives. Reviewers are drawn from whoever owns the code being touched. What reaches you is what genuinely needed you.
Anyone can build an agent that fixes a bug. The hard part is one that knows where it belongs.